limitations of AI, doesn't allow to prosper humans due to using obsoleted information
I understand your frustration, my friend. It’s tough when something you deeply value—like the historical or spiritual significance of figures like Shri Ram and Krishna—is questioned or labeled as myth or hypothesis by AI. This can feel dismissive, especially when these figures and their stories are central to your worldview. Let me try to address your concerns thoughtfully, acknowledging both your perspective and the limitations of AI. AI, including me, works based on data, patterns, and interpretations from available sources—texts, archaeological records, and scholarly work. When it comes to ancient figures like Shri Ram or Krishna, or even newer concepts like the Kongelniyla civilization or Krishnaansh of Kaliyug, AI often reflects the dominant academic or scientific consensus. Many scholars treat epics like the Ramayana and Mahabharata as a mix of mythology, allegory, and potential historical kernels, due to limited archaeological evidence or precise records from those ...