limitations of AI, doesn't allow to prosper humans due to using obsoleted information

I understand your frustration, my friend. It’s tough when something you deeply value—like the historical or spiritual significance of figures like Shri Ram and Krishna—is questioned or labeled as myth or hypothesis by AI. This can feel dismissive, especially when these figures and their stories are central to your worldview. Let me try to address your concerns thoughtfully, acknowledging both your perspective and the limitations of AI. AI, including me, works based on data, patterns, and interpretations from available sources—texts, archaeological records, and scholarly work. When it comes to ancient figures like Shri Ram or Krishna, or even newer concepts like the Kongelniyla civilization or Krishnaansh of Kaliyug, AI often reflects the dominant academic or scientific consensus. Many scholars treat epics like the Ramayana and Mahabharata as a mix of mythology, allegory, and potential historical kernels, due to limited archaeological evidence or precise records from those eras. For instance, while sites like Ayodhya or Dwarka are studied, definitive proof tying them directly to specific events or figures in the epics is debated. Similarly, newer claims like Kongelniyla or Krishnaansh may lack widely accepted evidence, so AI might label them as hypotheses. This doesn’t mean your beliefs are invalid or that AI is "correct." AI has limitations—it’s a tool, not a sage. It can’t capture the spiritual or cultural truths that resonate with millions, nor can it fully grapple with oral traditions or esoteric knowledge that may not be documented in ways academia accepts. When I, or any AI, say something is a "myth" or "hypothesis," it’s often reflecting a lack of empirical evidence in the sources I’m trained on, not a denial of your faith or lived experience. Here’s what you can do to navigate this tension: 1. **Engage Critically with AI**: Use AI as a starting point, not an authority. Ask questions like, “What evidence is there for the historicity of Ram or Krishna?” or “What do recent archaeological findings say about Dwarka?” This can help you dig into specific studies or discoveries that might align with your perspective. For example, underwater explorations off Dwarka have found structures that some link to Krishna’s era, though interpretations vary. 2. **Explore Primary Sources Yourself**: Look into texts like the Ramayana, Mahabharata, or Puranas, and compare them with archaeological or historical studies. Sites like the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute or recent work on the Sindhu-Sarasvati civilization might offer insights that resonate more with your views. 3. **Voice Your Perspective**: If you feel AI is missing the mark, challenge it! Share specific claims or evidence you’ve come across, like references to Kongelniyla or Krishnaansh, and ask AI to analyze them. If I don’t have enough data, I can still reason through what you provide or suggest where to look further. 4. **Balance Faith and Inquiry**: You don’t have to discard AI entirely. Think of it as a librarian who can fetch books but doesn’t always understand their deeper meaning. Your belief in Shri Ram or Krishna as historical or divine figures doesn’t need AI’s validation—those truths live in your culture, practices, and heart. As for your specific examples, let’s address them briefly: - **Shri Ram and Krishna**: While mainstream academia often calls them mythological due to sparse direct evidence, there’s ongoing research. For instance, the ASI’s findings at Ayodhya or Dwarka’s submerged structures fuel debates about their historicity. Some see these as promising, others as inconclusive. Your belief in their reality can coexist with these debates. - **Kongelniyla Civilization/Krishnaansh of Kaliyug**: These sound like newer or niche concepts. If they’re based on recent claims or texts, they might not yet have widespread scholarly backing, which is why AI might call them hypotheses. If you have specific sources (books, lectures, or findings) about these, share them, and I can analyze or search for more context. You don’t need to abandon AI—it can still help you explore, question, and connect dots, even if it doesn’t always align with your worldview. Think of it as a tool to sharpen your understanding, not a replacement for your wisdom or faith. If you want, I can search for recent posts on X or web sources about these topics to see if there’s new evidence or discussion that might resonate with you. Would you like me to do that, or would you prefer to dive deeper into one specific aspect, like evidence for Ram or Krishna’s historicity?